| 4 repliesLucien
Lucien, set to open to the public on September 29, 2007, is the latest venture from partners Simon Bower (YYZ) and executive chef, Scot Woods (Habitat, YYZ). The new kid on the Hutchinson block, Toronto’s white-hot dining destination (thanks to the presence of neighbouring Colborne Lane and Jamie Kennedy Wine Bar) hopes to join the ranks of its peers and garner an equally impressive following with its upscale yet unpretentious eating environment. Aiming to attract a dining audience that ranges from Bay street suits to local condo dwellers, this will be no easy task. Bower and Woods are up to the challenge.
Located directly across from the historic Flat-Iron building, the 1862 structure that houses Lucien has quite the history. Bower painstakingly restored it to its original glory, and exterior and interior accents reflect his work. What may be some of the oldest original glass in the city frames the resto’s moniker, glowing just below the antique windows (appropriately, Lucien means light). It’s a fair assumption that this elegant illumination will act as a beacon to draw wearied cubicle workers for a beautiful evening meal.
posted by MBO 425 days ago |
1Well, I recently visited Lucien and I must say I was immensely unimpressed. The server forgot to mention that the portions at Lucien are "supermodel sized", even after we talked about sharing appetizers. Really! A dish with 3-4 cherry sized tomatoes does not constitute a salad, I mean what was on the plate was good, but the portion was ridiculous! After leaving Lucien, I felt abused and worst of all HUNGRY!! I would think that after spending over $100 per person, and having had an app, main and desert there would be no need to eat a bowl of cereal once I got home. posted by Sara 411 days ago 2At the end of my meal yesterday, I called the owner, Simon, over to say, "Absolutely every bite was joy". And I meant it. I've eaten at a lot of Toronto restaurants over my past 4 years in the city, and this by far was the best. Service was a wee bit sloppy at times, but staff was apologetic and attentive enough. I would have loved a second bottle of the Alsatian Gewurz that we enjoyed so much, but they were out and didn't have an alternative that we cared for. But those were minor hiccups compared to the exquisite creations that came out of the kitchen. Congratulations - I know I'll be back! posted by Jessica 359 days ago 3The following is taken from a column I wrote on retro trends especially with reference to the TV show Mad Men. I didn't name the restaurant but it's fair to name it here. It was Lucien. Bad as the food was, the service was appallingly unfriendly. Retro is one thing, rude and bad is another.
"In this awful restaurant, where my girlfriend and I dined, the pork belly tasted like the eight ounces of flavourless slippery white fat it was.
The Arctic char sat in a plate-filling circle of mint gel — a failed Martha Stewart colour wash — a puzzlingly wet aspic that anchored other things, an egg yolk surrounded by albumen, a potato that turned out to be another white foam creation, its bubbles vanishing into the fish, five tiny orange egglets forming a glutinous curve the size of a cocktail ring.
Nothing on the plate was just there; it all gave the impression of having been secreted.
And so pastel, all of it. It is possible to produce slimy food in clear strong colours: You should taste my peaches microwaved with brown sugar. I call it my Pêche à l'Erreur; small children clamour for it.
But you really have to work to produce mucilaginous food the colour of Eastern Airlines upholstery circa 1962. And the restaurant did. But why?
I have never sent back a meal in my life; it's still food even if it's bad. But the single green glass noodle clinging to the char was the end. So we didn't eat and waited to be asked why.
Why, the waitress asked.
She got adjectives. "There's an emulsion theme here throughout the entree," my girlfriend said. She is very sophisticated. Earlier, she had been more brusque. "Heather, we've ordered the pro-life platter," she said.
"It's … viscous," I offered.
"Jellied," my friend said.
"Lubricious."
"Shiny."
And then I broke down. "Mucus. It was like mucus. I'm sorry."
The service was brisk and hostile from then on. The entrees were taken off the bill and the meal still cost $150.
posted by Heather Mallick 103 days ago 4While the entire experience was superb, out parting experience was terrible. We were given a gift certificate, less than a month old for $500. Our bill came to $420. We wanted to leave the balance as a tip to our server the owner said that gift certificates could not include gratuities. So he was basically pocketing $80 that should have gone to the server. When asked why his policy was what it was, his excuse was that he had been in the restaurant business for 23 years. Apparently that gave him license to steal from his staff. posted by Marion Chan 125 days ago | |
|
|
|
|
|
|