Martiniboys
MBO Toronto :: Articles
  • The 2009 Oscar Winners: Highs and Lows

    Email This Page Printable Version of this Article Submit a Review Add to my Favourites RSS Syndication       Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Blog to Reddit Add this Blog to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google
     Last Updated:February 23,2009 00:44:32 amThe 2009 Oscar Winners: Highs and Lows
    The 81st Annual Academy Awards has been penciled into everyone’s calendar for months. Who could miss out on an overblown awards show that for some reason is hosted by Hugh Jackman (seriously, what’s that about?) and honors The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button’s contribution to Hollywood’s history of self-important mediocre prestige pictures. It was always bound to be an exciting night and everyone was desperate to know the outcome. So, what happened? Geez, calm down and I’ll tell you.

    The big question on everyone’s mind was how Hugh Jackman would do as host given the fact that he is neither a comedian nor particularly funny. Things kicked off with Jackman doing a boring public school quality musical number that must have caused Billy Crystal to cringe. After that, he replaced the standard monologue with a tour of ass-kissery with the stars in the front row that set the tone for the rest of the night. Early on Hugh Jackman referred to this as his “first year as host.” Dear god don’t let there be more. He did enough embarrassingly pointless musical numbers for at least five years.

    Penelope Cruz picked up the first major award with a Best Supporting Actress win for her wonderfully psychotic work in Vicky Christina Barcelona. It was a well-deserved win, but set the tone for a very slow evening. The decision to have a separate presentation honoring each supporting actress nominee was probably fantastic for their egos, but it was also the most tedious possible way to give out the statue. It turned every acting award into an epic ten-minute presentation that put the world to sleep.

    Steve Martin and Tina Fey’s hilarious presentation on screenwriting was so inspired that it made you wish that either the two of them or anyone with a distinct comedic voice had been hired to host this year's show. Dustin Lance Black picked up his expected win for Milk and gave a tearful speech that is sure to be in inspirational Oscar montages for years to come. Simon Beaufoy snagged the Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire that the Academy may as well have sent to him weeks ago.

    Jennifer Anniston and Jack Black then delivered an apologetically edgy inside joke about Pixar before handing out the Oscar for Best Animated Feature to Wall-E. Wow! Who could ever possibly seen that coming? I jest of course. If Wall-E didn’t win, I would have hurt somebody. Kunio Katô then picked up the Oscar for Best Animated Short Film and dropped possibly the greatest “Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto” reference ever.

    A slew of technical awards gave home audiences a chance to open a fresh bag of salty snacks and chastise each other for incorrect choices on their Oscar pool (although, given the dearth of surprises thus far, I’d imagine everyone would be tied). A few young stars who are on minute 14 of their dwindling fame introduced a montage of the finest romantic moments in movies in 2008 that just might have been the most pointless montage in the history of the Oscars. Seriously, did I need to be reminded that Twilight, Last Chance Harvey, and Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist were released in 2008. I’ve been trying really hard to forget.

    Ben Stiller then introduced the Best Cinematography Oscar in an impression of Joaquin Phoenix, followed by a hilarious short film and onstage antics from Seth Rogen and James Franco. Their collective hilarity rubbed salt and vinegar into the open wound caused by host Hugh Jackman. Seriously, almost every Oscar presenter this year was funnier than Jackman. Who is that guy sleeping with and how can we stop it? I considered using this sentence as an opportunity to voice my distaste for the pointless “The Musical Is Back” musical number, but I’d rather just pretend that it didn’t happen. I think it would be best if we all did.


    After that, it was time to hand out the Best Supporting Actor Oscar with another overlong presentation from former Oscar winners (we get it, the nominees are great). I probably would have fallen asleep were it not for the fact that Christopher Walken was involved. Heath Ledger won and as Sir Charles Barkley surely would have said, “Anything less would be uncivilized.” It had to happen. It was deserved. This award was followed a very impressive short by Albert Maysles introducing the nominees for Best Documentary. Bill Maher gave out the Oscar and made his requisite jokes about Religulous not being nominated before giving the statue to Man On Wire. That was arguably the best film of the year and deserved the win (see it now, god damn it!). Philippe Petit—the subject of Man On Wire—gave the most entertaining victory speech of the night when he made a coin disappear for Werner Herzog and balanced an Oscar on his chin. Maybe he should have hosted.


    Quick side note: Did Jerry Lewis really win an honorary Oscar? Does this mean that the French have been right all along?

    Next up were the awards for Best Score and Best Song. Given that these are traditionally the most boring awards of the night when Isaac Hayes, Robin Williams, Trey Parker and Matt Stone aren’t involved, I tuned out like the rest of the world (hey, these awards came late in a boring telecast and the irritating kids from High School: The Shitty Musical were handing out the statues. What do you expect?). Slumdog Millionaire picked up both awards, making it clear that flick would be cleaning up. Departures then won Best Foreign Film, leaving only the big four awards left to be announced.

    Danny Boyle won a golden bald action figure for directing Slumdog Millionaire. That guy deserved it. The film really knocked audiences on their asses this year and he’s been one of the most underrated directors in the game since the 90s (he should of one for Trainspotting. A lot of people should have one awards for that movie). After that we got yet another overlong round of ego stroking in honor of the Best Actress Award. Kate Winslet snagged the statue, surprising no one. She was sweet and thankfully didn’t cry or say anything too crazy.

    The Best Actor Award came next and I hit mute instead of listening to celebrities fawning over the nominees. Seriously, they’d better not do this again. It’s boring, epitomizes all the worst aspects of the Academy Awards, and unfairly suggests that the acting categories are more important than the rest of the awards. I’ll stop whining about that now. The whole thing is so trivial and pointless that it doesn’t even deserve to be discussed further. Sean Penn won for Milk. It was a damn good performance, but not the best of the year. Mickey Rourke should have won, but it was a political choice and his speech will be replayed many times. This is the second time that Sean Penn beat out an actor delivering a career-best performance that demanded recognition (The guy owes Bill Murray and Mickey Rourke. Big time). Penn is one of the best actors of his generation, there’s no denying that. But he has not won Oscars for his best performances.


    Steven Spielberg then stepped up to the mic to hand out the Best Picture Oscar and draw the night to a merciful close. He introduced a bizarre Best Picture montage that included clips from classic Best Picture nominees. Perhaps the best part of the montage was how many of the classic films featured lost Best Picture (we’re talking at least 75%). Slumdog Millionaire picked up the Oscar, capping off a night virtually devoid of surprises with the most obvious win. Hugh Jackman then closed out the night with a final joke-free banal comment. Overall, it was a weak night at the Oscars. There were no surprises, the host was possibly the worst of all time, and all of the changes made to this year’s ceremony only served to make it feel even longer.

    On the plus side most of the winners deserved their awards this year. The list of winners was actually more satisfying than the ceremony itself. If you read this article rather than sitting through that never ending broadcast you made a wise decision. I wish I’d gone your route. But fortunately the show is finally over. It’s time to stop my writing and increase my drinking. Check out the full list of winners below and let us know what you thought about this year's Oscars with some sweet, sweet comments.

    Click here for more info including a complete list of winners: Well, The 2008 Oscars Happened

    18 Reader Reviews

    The show was great, Hugh Jackman did a great job. Better than all those hosts that deliver punchlines and then wait for 20 secs for everyone to laugh on their jokes. (which nobody gets)

    1. Sheema's Review :: February 27, 2009
    Sheema's Rating: 4 Stars
    I only watched parts of it but I thought Huge Jackman was a star - singing, dancing, chatting - all while looking good! I wonder if the writer has as much talent, or does he just excel at dissing people?

    2. Steph Elliott's Review :: February 24, 2009
    Steph Elliott's Rating: 2 Stars
    i thought huge Jackman was amazing, he had the hardest job and he did a great job, for the first time in a decade i was entertained. i think its a sure bet he will be doing it next year, The president of the academy said that he is desperate to continue with huge jackman and announced that he is one the best hosts in the history of the oscars.

    3. Eli's Review :: February 24, 2009
    Eli's Rating: 4 Stars
    I agree with Terrance Danner, I thought that honoring each of the nominees was a wonderful idea. I think we have all heard stars say, "It is an honor just to be nominated." With this new award presentation format they could truly feel that way. A few sentences in appreciation of their work, rather than a 10 second film clip is much more personal. I think the idea of returning to a 30's or 40's style show was a great idea, however it lacked in the delivery. Jackman did better than I thought, but at times things seemed a little high school musical-ish. Give it another go next year.

    4. Kimberly Verloop's Review :: February 24, 2009
    Kimberly Verloop's Rating: 3 Stars
    I think you hit the nail right on the head, it wasn't the Oscar's best night and the hosting duties were dull and boring.

    I think some of the choices were strange and i agree Sean Penn has done better work, I think Mickey Rourke deserved the award , his acting was incredible and the movie was underrated.

    I am happy Slumdog won so many awards , it was one of the best movies I have seen in a long time.

    The random appearance of Beyonce was awful and drab, she only added to the trainwreck that was this evening.

    I think Heath winning was not unexpected but was well deserved, though i found the part where they honor the actors ect.. we lost this past year to exclude him to be rather rude, i mean i know he was a recent talent but still i think he was worthy of recognition in that video.

    All in all I would give the show a 3/5 stars good but not great...

    5. Tammie's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Tammie's Rating: 4 Stars
    he was honored in last year's montage.

    6. Johnny Slam's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Johnny Slam's Rating: 3 Stars
    Obviously the AMERICAN audience didnt get the tribute that Hugh Jackman started with when he spoke of the financial crisis occuring so it would be practical for him to "Practice it and made the sets in his shed" as a reference to Australians doing so.

    Sorry if you dumb americans (That should be ameri-can'ts)don't get it but then again you have your heads shoved so far up your backside you cant see that beyond your shores lies a REAL WORLD and one might I add that DIDNT START THIS FINANCIAL MESS

    7. Daryne's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Daryne's Rating: 1 Stars
    A straight guy Kisses a Man and Wins Oscar, it might as well have been awarded to the Gay population as a Whole. Mickey Rourke's performance was the best I have seen in recent years...he was robbed!
    Really, I thought Hugh Jackman hit Rock Bottom in "Australia"; I stand corrected!!!!
    Somebody call "Daryne" an Waambulance. "Americans can't see beyond their shores" The Problem is that America gets to involved "beyond their shores" Of course Nobody complains When we are saving their ASS!!

    8. Eddie's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Eddie's Rating: 1 Stars
    Phil Brown is a talentless writer that could do no better in anything hes just put down. Thats why hes on this shitty website that no one gives a shit about. Heres a tip Phil, write to your mother, at least she might enjoy your bullshit. Or at least fake it.

    Too much time on your hands bud.

    And no one knows who you are, so you've obviously done nothing.

    Your a dreamer.

    I here Perez calling your name for a session.

    9. Cameron DAVIS's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Cameron DAVIS's Rating: 1 Stars
    I watched Nascar and flipped back to the Oscars during commercials and pits stops. From my point of view in Corrales, New Mexico, I found Hugh Jackman funny. Of course I didn't know who he was. I thought the fanny kissing made the ceremony seem more intimate. I thought the dresses were a bit long and that Angelina Jolie didn't seem very happy when looking into the camera. Her eyes were not sparkly.

    Of course I am an American, who will not qualify for any financial aid or bailout. I am one of the ones who has to pay to help others. I figured that the actors and directors don't need my financial support. So, I chose to watch the true redneck sport of Nascar and although my choice of drivers is Reed Sorenson, in the number 43 car, who never wins, I really liked his outfit.

    And to Phil, whoever you are, you are a great writer but you might think about having a little more fun and not take the Oscars too seriously. Hugh Jackson, whoever he is, didn't.

    10. Barbara Boyer's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Barbara Boyer's Rating: 3 Stars
    This makes me a bit sad. The Oscars has so much potential but just never seemed to recover from all of the changes throughout the years. I really did think this year would be the standout. But, no.

    11. Anne B. Tate's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Anne B. Tate's Rating: 4 Stars
    Sunday night's Oscars were dull and boring.

    12. Craig Oliver's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Craig Oliver's Rating: 4 Stars
    Sunday night's Oscars were indeed boring. Somebody in Hollywood needs to realize that this ceremony needs to be rescued, resuscitated and revitalized. Quickly. Didn't happen this year.

    13. Carole Penton's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Carole Penton's Rating: 3 Stars
    I thought the show was great and that Hugh Jackman did a fabulous job. Obviously you can't please everyone all the time.


    14. Linda's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Linda's Rating: 4 Stars
    I think the show was fantastic. There is no need to scrutinize every aspect, but one should see it as a performance. The Oscars are a momentous occasion and I think what we are forgetting that although viewership is important the main objective is to honour those in film. This is not "our" award ceremony, it is the the actors, directors, filmmakers, producers, sound editors etc...

    I think the way it was done was perfect. I loved how they did the best actor/actress awards (bringing out previous winners). It was symbolic and meaningful and I think it is darn right selfish for us to be shitting on it.

    15. Sarah's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Sarah's Rating: Stars
    *is

    Also, Jackman is the man. Good for him for doing all that. Man, you try singing, being funny and keeping high-class individuals entertained.

    16. Sarah's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Sarah's Rating: Stars
    I actually thought the new format was quite good. The Oscars is about being appreciated by your peers. And peers they (the recipients) admired gave them accolades and congratulations. If I was a recipient, I would have liked the personal touch much more than the same old standard ho-hum fare we are served every year.

    17. Terrance Danner's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Terrance Danner's Rating: 3 Stars
    Early estimates indicate that the Oscars' TV ratings actually went up for this year's telecast last night -- but that's not saying much.

    18. Roger Catrall's Review :: February 23, 2009
    Roger Catrall's Rating: 2 Stars

    Name
    Your City
    Email Address
    Overall Rating
    Your Review
     

    Back to Articles

    Toronto Hotels, Toronto Restaurants, Toronto Clubs, Toronto Shopping, Toronto Parties, Toronto Galleries, Toronto Theatre, Toronto Club News